shipper999

My feedback

  1. 215 votes
    Vote
    Sign in Sign in with ShipStation
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    shipper999 supported this idea  · 
    shipper999 commented  · 

    Yes, would like to see this.

  2. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in Sign in with ShipStation
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    Thanks for your great idea! We’ll keep this in mind but would like to see more interest from other users before we pursue this idea. For now, please leave your votes and comments to help keep this discussion active. Being specific in how this would affect your workflow and how you’re currently doing it will help our product team to implement new features. If you know any other users that are interested please send them here!

    shipper999 commented  · 

    "Being specific in how this would affect your workflow and how you’re currently doing it will help our product team to implement new features" As previously described, this affects my workflow because when the heavier portion of the label sheet ejects from the printer first, the sheets can't stack very well and fall off the catch tray and/or jam up in the output portion of the printer. I have tried three different desktop laser printers from three manufacturers, and this issue happens every time. Physics issues.

    As a result, someone needs to babysit the printer and catch each sheet individually.

    This being said, your competition has a very easy solution for this. They have very customizable templates so that you can customize output. just sayin'.

    shipper999 supported this idea  · 
    shipper999 shared this idea  · 
  3. 203 votes
    Vote
    Sign in Sign in with ShipStation
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    Thanks for bringing this up! We’ve reviewed your idea and the overall user feedback and are closing your idea to give your votes back since there hasn’t been any activity here in awhile. This allows everyone to use their votes on other ideas. The input you gave is still on our radar and your insights are greatly appreciated.

    shipper999 commented  · 

    Let's do this! Especially since USPS tracking is removed after 45 days now, and these ripoff artist customers who know that will do chargebacks after that time and sellers lose!

    shipper999 supported this idea  · 
  4. 95 votes
    Vote
    Sign in Sign in with ShipStation
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    Hi, @everyone! Can you help put this into perspective and add how often (relative to your single page packing slips) you’re needing to print additional pages?

    For example, in a week 3/4 of your orders require a single page for packing slips and the remaining 1/4 require 2 pages; very rarely does an order need more than 2 pages.

    shipper999 commented  · 

    So, this was requested 4 years ago and nothing has been done?

    To be blunt, this is a huge impact for shippers who fulfill based on packing slips. If items are missing, you have upset customers, double shipping charges to send missing items, negative feedback, lowered seller metrics, etc etc.

    Another shipping provider does this SEEMLESSLY without a problem. Their XML code just shrinks all the text and images sizes so even 10 items fit.

    That's why I only use Shipstation for a few selling channels. No way I can trust my Amazon shipments with this type of issue.

  5. 22 votes
    Vote
    Sign in Sign in with ShipStation
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    shipper999 shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base