@ShipStation - Any update on this?
Thank you all for voting and commenting.
The product team is reviewing your request and you’ll hear from us once we have made a decision.
Some additional feedback we would love to hear:
How often do you combine orders each week?
Are there times you do not want to combine orders even though they are going to the same location?
Feel free to add any more information that will help us make an informed decision by commenting here in the forum!
@Admin - any update on this?
156 votes48 comments · Product Feedback & Fresh Ideas » Selling Channels, Carriers & Other Connections · Admin →
Hi, thank you for letting us know about CommerceHub. While we do not currently have a native integration our partner eBridge can help.
Check out this blog to learn more: https://www.shipstation.com/blog/save-on-shipping-by-integrating-commercehub-to-shipstation-via-ebridge-connections/
@ShipStation - This is definitely a must-have integration that should be a priority for shipstation. +1
Inventory Locations on Pick List and Packing Slip are planned work. We assume the orders would have to be allocated first, or should all the item locations be listed? Let us know!
Thanks for your input! You’re right that we currently do not have a way to import alias SKUs in bulk, but we recently enhanced our combine product feature to also allow you to create aliases. When you click “Combine” from the Products page, you’ll see something a little different now.
Check out this article for more information: https://help.shipstation.com/hc/en-us/articles/205900498
For now, we’ll keep this request open and in addition to Dave La Chasse Blank Apparel’s comment, please let us know what your situation looks like today and what you’re looking to accomplish!
@Admin any update on this feature request? I have lots of sku aliases I'd like to upload.
Thanks for leaving your thoughts, everyone! We’re still reviewing this idea that has definite merit. For now, please leave your votes and comments to help keep this discussion active. Being specific in how this would affect your workflow and how you’re currently doing it will help our product team to implement new features.
This would definitely be a great feature
Thanks for leaving your thoughts, everyone! We’ll keep this in mind; for now, please leave your votes and comments to help keep this discussion active.
@Admin I believe this is a pretty important feature, as there are many channels/marketplaces that will use their own return label (e.g. Amazon), and currently, there is no way to track/manage that return in SS.
On a side note, it would be amazing if SS could pull in automatically an RMA when it's created, within Amazon (and other Marketplaces) as that would save a significant amount of time and energy currently spent tracking/locating and dealing with returns.
32 votes9 comments · Product Feedback & Fresh Ideas » Selling Channels, Carriers & Other Connections · Admin →
Thanks for bringing this up! We’ll keep this in mind, but would like to see more interest from other ShipStation users before we pursue a partnership. If you know any other users that are interested please send them here!
As developing a seamless integration typically requires cooperation from both parties, we recommend reaching out to VendorNet and expressing your interest in an integration to help expedite this process.
@Admin I'd really like to see this VendorNet integration happen and would be more than happy to help beta test everything.
Scan to Verify and Print is now AVAILABLE in the new version of ShipStation, and also now supports product identification by UPC, SKU, or both values.
We will mark this feature complete once Scan to Verify is a standalone mode from Print.
Additional features, settings are also in the works. Thank you all for your continued patience.
@Admin (and everyone else interested, like myself) it seems that another company, Groovepacker, has gone ahead and created a cloud-based QC/Barcode scanning program, and they actually integrate with ShipStation via API, according to their site https://www.groovepacker.com/integrations/shipstation-barcode-packing-scan-verify
Has anyone else tried out their software? I'd be interested to know if it's decent before I start any new implementation.
@Admin - maybe ShipStation should just buy them out for their IP and avoid the time and hassle of developing it.
Hey, @csr! Thanks for bringing this up! We’ll keep this in mind when updating our packing slips. For now, we’d like to see your idea gain more support from other users before making a decision.
Can you tell us what makes the packing slips different between your two stores? Hopefully this added information will help other users better understand your idea so they can add their input and votes.
@Admin - Exactly! Certain marketplaces/selling channels want their exact packing slips, not a shrunk down version on 4x6, but on 8.5x11 integrated slip/label it works out well, and they're ok with using that.
@Admin, we sell across multiple channels as 3rd party sellers, and we customize your stock packing slip to replicate (or at least come close to) each channels own packing slip, so that we can use an integrated packing slip/label, and not have to manually match up labels to packing slips. However, we can't do that for all channels, and so we definitely need the ability to select the proper packing slip size/label configuration. I would really like to see this implemented.
Hi, everyone! We’re still interested in seeing more users add their support for this idea, whether through votes or comments, so please keep them coming!
In the meantime, here are example codes for our packing slips that may point you in the right direction: https://help.shipstation.com/hc/en-us/articles/206639907
Please reach out to us through chat or at email@example.com if you’d like some more explanation on the examples.
@Admin - the idea of adjusting the label location on integrated packing slip
( http://support.shipstation.com/forums/330429-product-feedback-fresh-ideas/suggestions/10746279-adjust-the-location-of-the-4x6-shipping-label-on-t ), could be combined into this idea, once WYSIWYG is implemented.
I would really like to see this happen, sooner rather than later.