I have been using Allin1Ship for some time now and I love their service, however, they do not have a direct integration with Shipstation, this, therefore, doesn't allow me to have access to pricing or any additional benefits an integration would provide.

They told me they have direct integrations with other platforms and can go to them but I love ShipStation and don't want to leave.

Now, they are trying to integrate with Shipstation for all of their customers but ShipStation has to approve them first.

As a customer of both, I would really like to see this partnership happen and am sure many other would too.

ShipStation approve Allin1Ship!

#Allin1ship

Currently when a customer returns their item, they have a dropdown to select the reason for the return. "Exchange" is an option. However, there is no other product exchange info the customer can fill out. It would be great if they could select the new product, color, SKU #, and size they prefer in exchange. Maybe an "additional details" section as well. Then we can go full automated and do not have to include a paper form inside the original package asking the customer what they want in exchange for their return. It would make the whole returns process much more seamless and save time and paper.

I know we, like many other sellers, have many item types that have color/design variations, but are otherwise identical. I frequently have buyers who purchase multiples of an item, or several colors, or particular combinations to make a set. In the Shipment Automation I know for setting product automation, there is an option for Product Groups, with the examples given of Hats and Shirts, since each of those would ship identical, regardless of color/design. So, that's essentially what I'm wanting to do, instead of having Item Sku as the qualifier criteria, have Product Group, but that isn't a listed option. But that would do exactly what I need. Using the examples that ShipStation used in the Product Groups instruction, I could create one automation rule for Product Group = Hats; Total Quantity = 2, a second rule for Product Group = Shirts; Total Quantity = 2, and a third rule for Product Group = hats; Total Quantity = 1 AND Product Group = shirts; Total Quantity = 1. Then, that would create automation rules that any combination of 2 hats would apply rule 1, any combination of 2 shirts would apply rule 2, any combination of 1 and and 1 shirt would apply rule 3. So, all the building blocks are there; Product Group just needs added to the Automation Rules criteria list.

If Shipstation would allow me to add a label to each item in an order and allow me to customize that label I could manage most of my production using just Shipstation.

For example if I sell a wallet and a shirt in an order, the wallet and shirt would each have a label that I could print out and stick to the item during production.

The label could include: Total number of items in the order (Item 1/1, Item 1/3, etc), buyer name, sku number, order number etc etc.

This would allow me to use shipstation as production software as well as shipping software. Sample label attached.

Hi Shipstation Developers- Please make adding an ITN to a UPS shipment as easy and straightforward as adding ITN to USPS shipment. I have attached a photo of what the USPS ITN field looks like (red arrow) in the customs section of an order. This field is not available for UPS shipments for some reason.

(FWIW, I spent much time with a member of your support team chatting and emailing about this issue already and didn't really get anywhere. The rep was helpful but unfortunately their proposed workaround of adding the ITN to the 'ITN/Tax ID or USPS' line in Settings/Shipping/International Settings/ is problematic. First, to add an ITN to a UPS shipment, I have to click 4 times into a 'Default Setting' to enter my ITN (As you are aware, ITNs are not 'default' as they change per shipment). Once entered, the number becomes 'encrypted' and is hidden from view. There is no way to unhide this number. So I have no idea what the number currently is once I save it. Second, this number does not change back to 'nothing' or 'null' after it is used once, so it is possible that more than one order can have the same ITN if you aren't careful. For more information about what we discovered, please see request #984738.)

So again, the USPS method is great - please add this method to UPS shipments! I know these things can be easier said than done sometimes, but you've already done it for USPS so...

Thanks

There are almost 50 options for filtering and none of them are Product Total, despite this being one of the fields in the order details. The reason that Product Total is more useful than Order Total is that it shows the cost before taxes. I would like to create a filter based on product price and I cannot do this because as soon as tax is applied the filter no longer works. There are different taxes applied depending on the state so it's not really feasible to create a filter for each of the possible totals with tax. I've discussed this with someone at Shipstation via chat and they agreed that this is not currently possible, but would be useful!

Hello,

We have found that one of the largest time sinks and easily the most tedious job in our shipping process is selecting the cheapest Service (e.g. Fedex , UPS, USPS) for multiple orders.

** CURRENT WORKFLOW **
For example, say we have 1000 Amazon Prime Orders. Currently we need to click the "Calc" button on each individual order, then in the "Rate Calculator" dialog box, in the 'Amazon Fulfillment' tab, I click on the cheapest service available for a given order.

** ISSUE **
This causes US to calculate the cheapest rate available for 1000 orders - individually - which could take hours...

** HOPEFUL WORKFLOW **
What would be GREAT is to have a feature where I could select multiple orders (e.g. Orders tagged as Amazon Prime), and ~automagically~ retrieve the list of Services/Rates for each Order and have the option to select the cheapest Service for each order in bulk.

Please let me know if I can provide any further details.

Thanks!